Valeria?Vergara: A mother's grief, a population on the brink
Opinion: Why does Tahlequah’s grief demand our attention now? Why am I writing about a grieving whale? Because she isn't just mourning a lost calf — she is a member of a critically endangered population, one whose future depends entirely on the choices we make today.

Tahlequah is grieving. Hour after hour, day after day, she clings to the lifeless body of her newborn. She carries her calf through the cold waters of the Salish Sea, lifting it to the surface again and again, as if willing it to breathe.
This isn’t the first time she has known this pain. In 2018, Tahlequah lost another daughter — she carried her body for 17 days and over 1,600 kilometres, refusing to let go.
Tahlequah is a 27-year-old southern resident killer whale. I’m a whale research scientist twice her age, a woman in my mid-50s, and a mother to an 18-year-old daughter. Like her, I have carried my child, lifted her up, kept her close — although never with the crushing grief of a mom refusing to say goodbye. So as I watch the photographs of Tahlequah and her little one, as I take in her unfathomable sorrow, I feel an overwhelming empathy — I cry for her, and I cry with her.
Some would argue that we can never truly know what another species feels. We can’t ask Tahlequah, “Are you grieving?” But we don’t need to. We recognize grief when we see it, just as we recognize play, fear or joy. To be a social, intelligent species is to understand — at some level — the emotions of another. There was a time when science dismissed this as anthropomorphism, but we know better now. To deny what is so plainly visible isn’t objectivity; it’s wilful blindness.
I’m grateful to be a scientist in a world that has begun to acknowledge that animals have a complex emotional life, that grief isn’t a human monopoly and that recognizing this doesn’t make us biased — it makes us better observers of the natural world. I’m grateful to be a scientist in a world that has books like Barbara King’s How Animals Grieve and Carl Safina’s Beyond Words: What Animals Think and Feel — books that have helped shift the conversation toward a deeper, more compassionate understanding of the lives of other species.
So why does Tahlequah’s grief demand our attention now? Why am I spending this Saturday evening writing about a grieving whale?
- Orca still pushing body of her dead calf near Vancouver Island, 10 days after death
- UBC discovery of orca’s superpower makes them even more scary as yacht attacks rise
- Advertisement embed-more-topicStory continues below
Because she isn’t just mourning a lost calf — she is a member of a critically endangered population, one whose future depends entirely on the choices we make today.
Because Tahlequah is one of just 72 southern resident killer whales left in the world.
Together, J, K and L pods form a tight-knit society of closely bonded matrilines that have lived in these waters for generations. But their entire culture, their way of being, is imperilled. They have been drowning in chemical pollution, often deprived of their primary prey and forced to shout over the roar of boat engines to communicate. These whales depend on echolocation to hunt, yet only a fraction of the time are they able to hear their own echoes above the human-made noise that floods their world.
This population is on?a trajectory to extinction. But trajectories can change. There is still time.
The measures required to save them — science-based, urgent and uncompromising — may not always align with human convenience or economic interests. But extinction is forever. We have the knowledge, the tools and the responsibility to act.
And think about this: Every individual in this population is known. They’re not nameless statistics; they’re family members with identities, histories and relationships. Tahlequah. Kiki. Rainshadow. Every death isn’t just a loss to the species — it’s the loss of someone.
There is still time to give them a voice. Six conservation groups have petitioned the federal government for an emergency order under the Species at Risk Act to implement stronger protections for these whales. The science is clear, and the need for action is urgent.
It’s a bitter irony that the last time the federal cabinet faced this decision was 2018 — the same year Tahlequah embarked on her first heartbreaking odyssey, refusing to let the sea claim her daughter. Back then, the government declined to issue an emergency order, opting instead for interim measures that have failed to reverse the whales’ decline. Now, 6 1/2 years later, the federal Liberal cabinet faces the same choice while Tahlequah mourns another lost calf.
Will they listen to her this time? Will they make the right decision before it’s too late?
What happens next will determine whether these whales have a future.
Valeria Vergara is a senior scientist at the Raincoast Conservation Foundation.
Postmedia is committed to maintaining a lively but civil forum for discussion. Please keep comments relevant and respectful. Comments may take up to an hour to appear on the site. You will receive an email if there is a reply to your comment, an update to a thread you follow or if a user you follow comments. Visit our Community Guidelines for more information.